The Utility of Maternal TORCH Screening Due to Obstetrical Indications in Detecting Congenital Infections: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of TORCH screening for obstetrical indications is unclear. We evaluated TORCH testing results among women with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios; and associations with congenital infections in neonates. METHOD: This retrospective single-center study included all the women diagnosed with IUGR, polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios who underwent serological TORCH testing during 2010-2019. TORCH screening included Toxoplasma, cytomegalovirus (CMV), rubella IgM and IgG. The data, which were cross-referenced with data of neonates with congenital TORCH infections during the same period, included indications for neonatal testing, sonographic findings and neonatal ophthalmologic and hearing findings. RESULT: Six women of 771 (0.8%) were diagnosed with primary TORCH infection: 4 (0.5%) with toxoplasmosis, and 2 (0.3%) with CMV. None had a confirmed congenital infection. The rates of positive maternal TORCH screening in IUGR and polyhydramnios were 2.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Maternal TORCH infection was not identified in any woman with oligohydramnios or severe polyhydramnios. None of the neonates with congenital infection were screened for TORCH during pregnancy due to polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios or IUGR. Among the neonates with congenital CMV, the most common indication for performing neonatal CMV polymerase chain reaction was suspected primary maternal infection during pregnancy due to symptomatic CMV. No incidences of congenital rubella were noted in the last decade in our medical center. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that routine TORCH screening in pregnancies complicated with IUGR, polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios should be avoided. Suggestive maternal symptoms and specific fetal sonographic features should prompt testing for CMV and Toxoplasma infection.

Third trimester re-screening for gestational diabetes in morbidly obese women despite earlier negative test can reveal risks for obstetrical complications.

AIM: We investigated associations of maternal obesity with late gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis (>34 weeks) in women with previous normal glucose screening, and associations of late GDM with obstetrical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of 238 women with normal (24-28 week) glucose screening results, who underwent late repeat oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) (>34 weeks) due to a suspected LGA fetus (54.6%) or polyhydramnios (45.4%). A sub-analysis was performed of outcomes of women with late versus mid-trimester GDM. RESULTS: The GDM rate in repeat OGTT screening was 22.2% for the total sample, and 33% among women with morbid obesity. Among women with late GDM versus without late GDM, rates were higher for macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age fetus induction of labor, neonatal hypoglycemia, jaundice, and the need for phototherapy. Among women with late GDM, a higher pregestational BMI was associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Higher risks for macrosomia and CS due to macrosomia were demonstrated in women with late vs. mid-trimester GDM. CONCLUSION: Late screening in pregnancy may reveal GDM among women with previous normal glucose screening, particularly among those with late third trimester BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 , GDM in a previous pregnancy or fasting glucose >95 mg/dl. Women diagnosed with GDM at >34 weeks following normal glucose screening at 24-28 weeks are at higher risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. For women with morbid obesity, or suspected macrosomia or polyhydramnios in the late third trimester, and normal glucose screening in the second trimester, retesting should be considered.

Clinical implications of the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test in the third trimester.

PURPOSE: The clinical implications of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosed in the third trimester are not well established and controversy continues regarding the performance of diagnostic tests beyond 28-week gestation. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of abnormal third trimester oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results in women at high risk and to compare the obstetric and neonatal outcomes with those of women with normal OGTT results. METHODS: The study included 372 women who completed late (>29 weeks) 100-g OGTT due to suspected fetal macrosomia, polyhydramnios or a personal risk factor for GDM, diagnosed according to the Carpenter & Coustan criteria. Women with only one abnormal OGTT value were diagnosed with GDM by abnormal glucose follow-up and analyzed separately. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the GDM and the non-GDM groups. RESULTS: GDM was diagnosed in 85/372 (22%) women, including 35 (59.3%) women with one abnormal OGTT value who were later diagnosed with GDM. Of 200 women who had a normal 1-h 50-g glucose challenge test at 24-28 weeks, late GDM was diagnosed in 33 (16.5%). Seventy-six (89.5%) of those with GDM were treated by dietary therapy and 9 (10.5%) by pharmacological therapy. Among women with GDM, large-for-gestational-age fetuses, labor induction and elective cesarean section were more prevalent than for those without GDM. Significant differences were not found between the groups in macrosomia and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of OGTT in women with risk factors during the third trimester should be considered following further prospective trials.

Obstetrical Outcome following Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes in the Third Trimester (>29 Weeks) versus Second Trimester (24-28 Weeks): A Retrospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare obstetrical outcomes between women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the third trimester after testing negative for GDM in two-step screening in the second trimester and women diagnosed in the second trimester. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study compared obstetrical outcomes between 375 women diagnosed with GDM in the second trimester and 125 diagnosed in the third trimester. RESULTS: Among women diagnosed with GDM in the third versus second trimester, the incidences were higher of morbid obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2), macrosomia, and cesarean section (CS) due to suspected macrosomia: 23.2 versus 9.8%, p < 0.001; 44.0 versus 10.1%, p < 0.001; and 24.8 versus 6.3%, p < 0.001, respectively. For those diagnosed in the third versus second trimester, the incidences were lower of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction, and a lower proportion of women needed pharmacological therapy for glucose control: 2.4 versus 9.0%, p = 0.016; 0.8 versus 8.2%, p < 0.001; and 12.0 versus 29.7%, p < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate analysis supported a correlation between third-trimester-diagnosed GDM and macrosomia, and between second-trimester-diagnosed GDM and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Among women diagnosed with GDM in the third compared with the second trimester, the incidence of morbid obesity was higher; accordingly, the risks were higher for large for gestational age infants and delivery by CS, and lower for hypertensive disorders. Guidelines regarding repeat oral glucose tolerance testing in the third trimester should be considered following prospective studies. KEY POINTS: · Third-trimester GDM was 29.9% among women with normal second-trimester screening.. · Morbid obesity and macrosomia were more frequent in third- versus second-trimester GDM.. · Incidence of preeclampsia was lower in third- versus second-trimester-diagnosed GDM..